Art that is OFFENSIVE and The shaving of the pubic area.

what constitutes"offensive"?
I write a blog in the Desert Sun newspaper in my local town.
Sometimes I post the same blog as this one.
Yesterday, I copied this blog regarding "jeans suck" and pasted it in the newspaper blog.
WHOOPS! The photo attached was one taken this past weekend at an art gallery. I had been asked to pose with my middle finger out in front of a Peter Guntz Photo of a naked woman holding up her middle finger,giving the "fuck you" sign.
It was Art within art.I thought it fit the "jeans suck". title.
I didnt really notice that she had a shaved pubic area in the photo. So what?
Its art,its his idea of art. I didnt really like the shaved look but it isnt MY art.
Ok, beyond the question of "what is art?" is the question of "what is offensive?.
many people were offended by the photo in the news blog.
Personally, I feel that the whole TREND of totally shaving one's pubic region is akin to pedophilia. It gets very close.
There's no hygenic reason...does it look "better"? I understand a bikini wax, a trim ...but naked down below,yikes! ,,,,realistically, it looks like a pre-pubescent girl...similar to geishas having their feet bound to look like little girls... ..., fetish becomes mainsteam stuff. But, thats just my opinion....So, what if the girl in the photo was 14?..or 16? would that be offensive? help me out here...when does art cross into tasteless cross into porno cross into pedohilia?
I can only say what makes ME uncomfortable and what makes ME sick.
I was not bothered by the photos at all.I AM discouraged at glorifying shaven pubic areas in woman trying to look like girls.
Strong empowered women do not need to look like little girls.The Goddess is perfectly coifed, as is.
And true Gods appreciate the well kept,neatly trimmed, but biologically active woman.